Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR408 14
Original file (NR408 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHGUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

BC oO
Docket No: 00408-14
26 June 2014

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD OF FoRNER Qe

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1)
with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 (not
recommended for retention) reentry code, issued on 7 March 2013,
be changed.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Boyd, and Ms.
Countryman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 25 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the’ Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Petitioner entered the Marine Corps on 1 December 2009.
'On 4 September 2012, he was diagnosed with a medical condition
(sleepwalking) and recommended for administrative separation.

On 28 February 2013, he signed and acknowledged a page il
counseling entry that he would receive an RE-4 reentry code upon
-his separation. On 7 March 2013, he was separated with an
honorable discharge by reason of condition, not a disability and
assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
b. Petitioner could have been assigned a waivable RE-3P
(failure to meet physical/medical standards) reentry code.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable
action.

The Board concludes that based upon his diagnosed medical
condition, that relief in the form of changing his RE-4 to an
RE-3P is warranted. In view of the above, the Board recommends
the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he received an RE-~3P vice an RE-4 (reentry code on 7 March 2013.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN 7 BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0081 14

    Original file (NR0081 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received an RE-3P vice an RE-3C reentry code on 14 July 1986. b. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5689-13

    Original file (NR5689-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 17 May 13 w/attachments (2) Subject’s naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be ‘corrected by changing the characterization of his general Giecharge issued on 12 July 1991 to an honorable discharge. On 12 July 1991, he received a general characterization of service due to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4107-13

    Original file (NR4107-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BIG Docket No: 4107-13 19 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ‘ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05561-10

    Original file (05561-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing block 27 (Reentry Code) of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) from RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) to RE-1 (recommended for retention) or RE-2 (ineligible for reenlistment) . The Board finds that neither an RE-1 nor RE-2 reentry...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR630 14

    Original file (NR630 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-30 (orders refusal) reentry code, issued on 28 December 2013, be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6960 13

    Original file (NR6960 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was then recommended for administrative separation due to his diagnosed personality disorder. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner’s reentry code. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 9 April 2008, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8264 13

    Original file (NR8264 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect the reentry code of RE-3E (Inducted/Enlisted/Extended/Reenlisted in é recommended for reenlistment) in block 27 0 Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 1s cS 30 May 2012. The Board, consisting of ee fa reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2014, and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2971 14

    Original file (NR2971 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    >, The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Sproul and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Subsequently, the BOI recommended that he be separated with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge. The Board concludes that relief in the form of his assigned RE-3P reentry code be changed to read...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7678 13

    Original file (NR7678 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a Former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect the reentry code of RE-3E (Inducted/Enlisted/Extended/Reenlisted in error) vice RE-4 recommended for reenlistment) in block 27 of his DD Form 21 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Acti ) 4 3 March 2009. ry The,,Board, consisting oa AES a reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0017 14

    Original file (NR0017 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Bianchi and Messrs. Dixit and Gattis, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 April 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. He was recommended for administrative separation due to his diagnosed condition. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by changing his RE-4 reentry code, which was issued on 21 September 2007, to RE-36G, b.